> Details

Holford, Dawn; Fasce, Angelo; Tapper, Katy; Demko, Miso; Lewandowsky, Stephan; Hahn, Ulrike; Abels, Christoph M.; Al-Rawi, Ahmed; Alladin, Sameer; Sonia Boender, T.; Bruns, Hendrik; Fischer, Helen; Gilde, Christian; Hanel, Paul H. P.; Herzog, Stefan M.; Kause, Astrid; Lehmann, Sune; Nurse, Matthew S.; Orr, Caroline; Pescetelli, Niccolò; Petrescu, Maria; Sah, Sunita; Schmid, Philipp; Sirota, Miroslav;

Science Communication as a Collective Intelligence Endeavor: A Manifesto and Examples for Implementation

Reference
management

Bookmarks

Remove from
bookmarks

Share this on Whatsapp

Close

Bookmarks



You can manage bookmarks using lists, please log in to your user account for this.
  • Media type: E-Article
  • Title: Science Communication as a Collective Intelligence Endeavor: A Manifesto and Examples for Implementation
  • Contributor: Holford, Dawn; Fasce, Angelo; Tapper, Katy; Demko, Miso; Lewandowsky, Stephan; Hahn, Ulrike; Abels, Christoph M.; Al-Rawi, Ahmed; Alladin, Sameer; Sonia Boender, T.; Bruns, Hendrik; Fischer, Helen; Gilde, Christian; Hanel, Paul H. P.; Herzog, Stefan M.; Kause, Astrid; Lehmann, Sune; Nurse, Matthew S.; Orr, Caroline; Pescetelli, Niccolò; Petrescu, Maria; Sah, Sunita; Schmid, Philipp; Sirota, Miroslav;
  • Published: SAGE Publications, 2023
  • Published in: Science Communication, 45 (2023) 4, Seite 539-554
  • Language: English
  • DOI: 10.1177/10755470231162634
  • ISSN: 1075-5470; 1552-8545
  • Origination:
  • Footnote:
  • Description: <jats:p> Effective science communication is challenging when scientific messages are informed by a continually updating evidence base and must often compete against misinformation. We argue that we need a new program of science communication as collective intelligence—a collaborative approach, supported by technology. This would have four key advantages over the typical model where scientists communicate as individuals: scientific messages would be informed by (a) a wider base of aggregated knowledge, (b) contributions from a diverse scientific community, (c) participatory input from stakeholders, and (d) better responsiveness to ongoing changes in the state of knowledge. </jats:p>