You can manage bookmarks using lists, please log in to your user account for this.
Media type:
E-Article
Title:
Implementation of Birth-Cohort Testing for Hepatitis C Virus : Lessons Learned From Three Primary Care Sites
:
Lessons Learned From Three Primary Care Sites
Contributor:
Kruger, Danielle Liffmann;
Rein, David B.;
Kil, Natalie;
Jordan, Cynthia;
Brown, Kimberly A.;
Yartel, Anthony;
Smith, Bryce D.
Published:
SAGE Publications, 2017
Published in:
Health Promotion Practice, 18 (2017) 2, Seite 283-289
Language:
English
DOI:
10.1177/1524839916661495
ISSN:
1524-8399;
1552-6372
Origination:
Footnote:
Description:
Hepatitis C virus infection affects approximately 2.2 to 3.2 million Americans. In 2012, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended a one-time antibody test of all persons belonging to the 1945-1965 birth cohort. Efforts to implement this recommendation in clinical settings are in their infancy; this case study report therefore seeks to share the experiences of three sites that implemented interventions to increase birth-cohort testing through participation in the Birth-cohort Evaluation to Advance Screening and Testing for Hepatitis C. At each site, project managers completed standardized questionnaires about their implementation experiences, and a qualitative analysis was conducted of the responses. The testing interventions used in-person recruitment, mail recruitment, and an electronic health record prompt. Sites reported that early efforts to obtain stakeholder buy-in were critical to effectively implement and sustain interventions and that the intervention required additional staffing resources beyond those being used for risk-based testing. In each case, administrative barriers were more extensive than anticipated. For the electronic health record–based intervention, technological support was critical in achieving study goals. Despite these barriers, interventions in all sites were successful in increasing rates of testing and case identification, although future studies will need to evaluate the relative costs and benefits of each intervention.