> Details

van den Boom, Louisa; Auzanneau, Marie; Woelfle, Joachim; Sindichakis, Marina; Herbst, Antje; Meraner, Dagmar; Hake, Kathrin; Klinkert, Christof; Gohlke, Bettina; Holl, Reinhard W.

Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pump Therapy Sensor Augmented Pump or Automated Insulin Delivery in Different Age Groups (0.5 to

Reference
management

Bookmarks

Remove from
bookmarks

Share this on Whatsapp

Close

Bookmarks



You can manage bookmarks using lists, please log in to your user account for this.
  • Media type: E-Article
  • Title: Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pump Therapy Sensor Augmented Pump or Automated Insulin Delivery in Different Age Groups (0.5 to
  • Contributor: van den Boom, Louisa; Auzanneau, Marie; Woelfle, Joachim; Sindichakis, Marina; Herbst, Antje; Meraner, Dagmar; Hake, Kathrin; Klinkert, Christof; Gohlke, Bettina; Holl, Reinhard W.
  • Published: SAGE Publications, 2024
  • Published in: Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 18 (2024) 5, Seite 1122-1131
  • Language: English
  • DOI: 10.1177/19322968231156601
  • ISSN: 1932-2968
  • Origination:
  • Footnote:
  • Description: Aim: Insulin pump, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), and sensor augmented pump (SAP) technology have evolved continuously leading to the development of automated insulin delivery (AID) systems. Evaluation of the use of diabetes technologies in people with T1D from January 2018 to December 2021. Methods: A patient registry (Diabetes Prospective Follow-up Database [DPV]) was analyzed for use of SAP (insulin pump + CGM ≥90 days, no automated dose adjustment) and AID (HCL or LGS/PLGS). In total 46,043 people with T1D aged 0.5 to <26 years treated in 416 diabetes centers (Germany, Austria, Luxemburg, and Switzerland) were included and stratified into 4 groups A-D according to age. Additionally, TiR and HbA1c were analyzed. Results: From 2018 to 2021, there was a significant increase from 28.7% to 32.9% (sensor augmented pump [SAP]) and 3.5% to 16.6% (AID) across all age groups, with the most frequent use in group A (<7 years, 38.8%-40.2% and 10.3%-28.5%). A similar increase in SAP and AID use was observed in groups B (7 to <11 years) and C (11 to <16 years): B: +15.8 PP, C: +15.9 PP. HbA1c improved significantly in groups C and D (16 to <26 years) (both P < .01). Time in range (TiR) increased in all groups (A: +3 PP; B: +5 PP; C: +5 PP; D: +5 PP; P < 0.01 for each group). Insulin pumps (61.0% versus 53.4% male) and SAP (33.5% versus 28.9% male) are used more frequently in females. Conclusion: In recent years, we found an increasing use of new diabetes technologies and an improvement in metabolic control (TiR) across all age groups.