• Media type: E-Article
  • Title: Are the definitions for chronic diarrhoea adequate? Evaluation of two different definitions in patients with chronic diarrhoea
  • Contributor: Stotzer, Per-Ove; Abrahamsson, Hasse; Bajor, Antal; Kilander, Anders; Sadik, Riadh; Sjövall, Henrik; Simrén, Magnus
  • Published: Wiley, 2015
  • Published in: United European Gastroenterology Journal, 3 (2015) 4, Seite 381-386
  • Language: English
  • DOI: 10.1177/2050640615580219
  • ISSN: 2050-6406; 2050-6414
  • Keywords: Gastroenterology ; Oncology
  • Origination:
  • Footnote:
  • Description: <jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>The classical definition of chronic diarrhoea is ≥3 defecations/day, with a stool weight of more than 200 g and duration of ≥4 weeks. However, with this definition many patients with substantial symptoms and pathology will be excluded from further investigations. As a consequence other definitions have been proposed, mainly based on evaluation of the stool form.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>To evaluate the accuracy of the classic criteria for diarrhoea in comparison with a definition based on stool consistency, using the Bristol Stool Form Scale.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>All patients were investigated with laboratory tests, upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy with biopsies, and SeHCAT test. They were asked to complete a diary recording stool frequency and consistency during a week, as well as other gastrointestinal symptoms (pain, bloating and gas).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>One hundred and thirty‐nine subjects were eligible for analysis. Ninety‐one had an organic cause of diarrhoea. Fifty‐three patients had ≥3 loose stools/day, whereas 86 reported &lt;3 stools/day. Ninety had a median stool consistency that was mushy or loose and 49 had harder stools. A higher proportion of subjects with an organic cause of their diarrhoea compared with subjects with a functional bowel disorder had ≥3 loose stools/day, 43/91 (47%) <jats:italic>vs</jats:italic>. 10/48 (21%) (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic>  &lt; 0.01). Similarly, more subjects with an organic cause of their diarrhoea versus patients with a functional bowel disorder had a median stool consistency that was mushy or watery, 73/91 (80%) <jats:italic>vs</jats:italic>. 17/48 (35%), <jats:italic>p</jats:italic>  &lt; 0.0001. When diarrhoea was defined according to stool form, more patients were classified correctly as having a functional disorder or organic disorder, compared with the classical definition (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic>  &lt; 0.05).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>Loose stools defined according to the Bristol Stool Form scale seem to be the best predictor of having an organic cause of the diarrhoea.</jats:p></jats:sec>
  • Access State: Open Access