• Media type: E-Article
  • Title: Levels of Minimal Residual Disease Prior to Transplant Influence Outcome of Adult Patients with Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
  • Contributor: Lussana, Federico; Intermesoli, Tamara; Gianni, Francesca; Boschini, Cristina; Masciulli, Arianna; Spinelli, Orietta; Oldani, Elena; Tosi, Manuela; Marfisi, Rosa Maria; Grassi, Anna; Parolini, Margherita; Audisio, Ernesta; Cattaneo, Chiara; Raimondi, Roberto; Angelucci, Emanuele; Cavattoni, Irene Maria; Scattolin, Anna Maria; Cortelezzi, Agostino; Mannelli, Francesco; Ciceri, Fabio; Mattei, Daniele; Borlenghi, Erika; Terruzzi, Elisabetta; Romani, Claudio; [...]
  • imprint: American Society of Hematology, 2015
  • Published in: Blood
  • Language: English
  • DOI: 10.1182/blood.v126.23.4374.4374
  • ISSN: 0006-4971; 1528-0020
  • Keywords: Cell Biology ; Hematology ; Immunology ; Biochemistry
  • Origination:
  • Footnote:
  • Description: <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>Background With the advent of imatinib and the other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting BCR-ABL1, the outcomes of Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) improved substantially. Nonetheless, allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) in first complete remission (CR1) remains the consolidation therapy of choice in Ph+ ALL. Evidence is emerging that post-transplant relapse is influenced by the persistence of minimal residual disease (MRD), with an inferior outcome of patients undergoing transplantation with measurable level of MRD (Sramkova L et al, Pediatr Blood Cancer 2007; Bar M et al. Leuk Res Treatment 2014). Considering that a deeper molecular response can probably be achieved with innovative targeted therapies, such as second and third-generation TKIs or immunotherapy, an accurate evaluation of MRD values before alloSCT may be very relevant.</jats:p> <jats:p>Aim of the study. To evaluate the predictive relevance of MRD levels before transplant in Ph+ALL patients in CR1 on the probabilities of (i) overall survival (OS), (ii) relapse incidence (CIR) and (iii) leukemia free survival (LFS)</jats:p> <jats:p>Patients and methods. One hundred and six adult patients (median age 41.2, range 19-62) with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL (as determined by cytogenetic or molecular analysis) were enrolled into 2 prospective NILG protocols (09/00 ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT00358072 and 10/07 ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT00358072) and were treated with chemotherapy and imatinib. One hundred (94%) achieved CR1, of whom 72 patients underwent an alloSCT in CR1 and are the subject of this report. MRD was determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) according to validated methods.</jats:p> <jats:p>Results. Among the 72 patients undergoing alloSCT, MRD status before transplant was available for 65 patients (90%). Twenty-four patients (37%) achieved a complete molecular response (BCR-ABL/ABL&lt;1x10-5) at time of conditioning (MRD- group), while 41 (63%) remained carriers of any positive MRD level in the bone marrow or peripheral blood (MRD+ group), ranging from 1.2x10-4 to 2x10-1. Patients' characteristics were similar between MRD+ and MRD- groups, except for a higher hemoglobin levels and a predominance of male gender in MRD- group, as summarized in Table 1. Thirty-five patients received alloSCT from a sibling and 37 from unrelated donor. The conditioning regimen to alloSCT was myeloablative in 85% and reduced intensity in 15% of patients. The stem cell source was the bone marrow in 19%, the peripheral blood in 78% and cord blood in the remaining 3% of patients.</jats:p> <jats:p>For the whole patient cohort (n=106), the median follow-up was 2.8 years (range 0.06-11.8), with a 5 years OS of 41%. The OS of patients receiving alloSCT was 50%. The MRD negativity at time of conditioning was associated with a significant benefit in terms of risk of relapse with a CIR of 8% compared to 39% of patients with MRD positivity (p=0.007) (Figure 1A). Nonetheless, the LFS and OS probability were not significant different in MRD- compared to MRD+ patients (58% vs 41%, p=0.17 and 58% vs 49%, p=0.55, respectively) (Figure1B), likely due to the effective post-relapse treatment with TKIs and/or DLI. The cumulative incidence of non relapse mortality was similar in MRD- compared to that of MRD+ group (33% vs 20%, p=0.22).</jats:p> <jats:p>Conclusions. Our results confirm that patients undergoing alloSCT with measurable levels of MRD show a significant increase risk of relapse after transplant. These results highlight the importance of achieving a complete molecular remission before transplant that should be considered an essential prerequisite for successful alloSCT.</jats:p> <jats:p>Table 1. Patients' characteristics according to MRD group Characteristics MRD negative (N=24) MRD positive (N=41) P Age years , median (range) 45.0 (21.4-58.2) 42.7 (18.5-62.4) 0.95 Male sex (%) 16 (67) 15 (37) 0.01 WBC, X 109/L, median (range) 27.7 (0.9-350.0) 12.0 (1.1-680.0) 0.12 Hemoglobin, g/dL, median (range) 11.4 (5.4-14.6) 9.0 (3.7-16.5) 0.02 Platelets, X 109/L, median (range) 41.0 (4.0-336.0) 34.0 (3.0-325.0) 0.44 LDH, U/L median (range) 1231 (353-8104) 715 (65-6194) 0.12 Conditioning regimen (%)Reduced intensity Myeloablative 4 (17)20 (83) 7 (17)34 (83) 1.00 Donor type (%)SiblingUnrelated 13 (54)11 (46) 18 (44)23 (56) 0.73 Graft type (%)Bone marrow Peripheral blood Cord blood 3 (12)20 (83)1 (4) 9 (22)31 (76)1 (2) 0.91</jats:p> <jats:p>Figure 1. CIR and LFS according to MRD group Figure 1. CIR and LFS according to MRD group</jats:p> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Disclosures</jats:title> <jats:p>No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
  • Access State: Open Access