• Media type: E-Article
  • Title: Uptake of HIV testing among adolescents and associated adolescent-friendly services
  • Contributor: Kidman, Rachel; Waidler, Jennifer; Palermo, Tia; Palermo, Tia; Groppo, Valeria; Kajula, Lusajo; de Hoop, Jacobus; Prencipe, Leah; Nkolo, Jennifer Waidler Johanna Choumert; Mitti, Respichius; Munanka, Bhoke; Luchemba, Paul; Lukongo, Tumpe Mnyawami; Mulokozi, Aroldia; Gilbert, Ulrike; van Ufford, Paul Quarles; Le Kirkegaard, Rikke; Eetaama, Frank
  • imprint: Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2020
  • Published in: BMC Health Services Research
  • Language: English
  • DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05731-3
  • ISSN: 1472-6963
  • Origination:
  • Footnote:
  • Description: <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>HIV testing remains low among adolescents. Making public health services more adolescent-friendly is one strategy used to encourage testing. However, it remains unclear whether government-led initiatives have a meaningfully impact.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>The current study is observational and utilizes two sources of data (health-facility and adolescent-level) from one round of data collection of an on-going, longitudinal impact evaluation of a pilot cash plus program targeting adolescents. This study linked data from adolescent surveys (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 2191) to data collected from nearby government-run health facilities (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 91) in two rural regions of Tanzania. We used log binomial regression models to estimate the association between specific adolescent-friendly health service (AFHS) characteristics and adolescents’ uptake of 1) HIV testing and 2) visiting a health care facility in the past year for sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>Most adolescents (67%) lived in a village with a health facility, and all offered HIV services. We find, however, that AFHS have not been fully implemented. For example, less than 40% of facilities reported that they had guidelines for adolescent care. Only 12% of facilities had a system in place for referral and follow-up with adolescent clients, yet this was an important predictor of both past-year HIV testing (RR = 1.28, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.1) and SRH visits (RR = 1.44, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.05). Less than half (44%) offered services for survivors of gender-based violence (GBV), a significant predictor of past-year HIV testing (RR = 1.20, p &lt; 0.05) and SRH visits (RR = 1.41, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.01) among sexually-active adolescents.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>We find that national guidelines on AFHS have not been fully translated into practice at the local level. We highlight particular gaps in adolescent referral systems and GBV services. Scaling up these two essential services could encourage greater HIV testing among a high-risk population, in addition to providing much needed support for survivors of violence.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
  • Access State: Open Access