Madayag, Robert M.;
Sercy, Erica;
Berg, Gina M.;
Banton, Kaysie L.;
Carrick, Matthew;
Lieser, Mark;
Tanner, Allen;
Bar-Or, David
Are trauma research programs in academic and non-academic centers measured by equal standards? A survey of 137 level I trauma centers in the United States
You can manage bookmarks using lists, please log in to your user account for this.
Media type:
E-Article
Title:
Are trauma research programs in academic and non-academic centers measured by equal standards? A survey of 137 level I trauma centers in the United States
Contributor:
Madayag, Robert M.;
Sercy, Erica;
Berg, Gina M.;
Banton, Kaysie L.;
Carrick, Matthew;
Lieser, Mark;
Tanner, Allen;
Bar-Or, David
Published:
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2021
Published in:
Patient Safety in Surgery, 15 (2021) 1
Description:
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec>
<jats:title>Background</jats:title>
<jats:p>American College of Surgeons level I trauma center verification requires an active research program. This study investigated differences in the research programs of academic and non-academic trauma centers.</jats:p>
</jats:sec><jats:sec>
<jats:title>Methods</jats:title>
<jats:p>A 28-question survey was administered to ACS-verified level I trauma centers in 11/12/2020–1/7/2021. The survey included questions on center characteristics (patient volume, staff size), peer-reviewed publications, staff and resources dedicated to research, and funding sources.</jats:p>
</jats:sec><jats:sec>
<jats:title>Results</jats:title>
<jats:p>The survey had a 31% response rate: 137 invitations were successfully delivered via email, and 42 centers completed at least part of the survey. Responding level I trauma centers included 36 (86%) self-identified academic and 6 (14%) self-identified non-academic centers. Academic and non-academic centers reported similar annual trauma patient volume (2190 vs. 2450), number of beds (545 vs. 440), and years of ACS verification (20 vs. 14), respectively. Academic centers had more full-time trauma surgeons (median 8 vs 6 for non-academic centers) and general surgery residents (median 30 vs 7) than non-academic centers. Non-academic centers more frequently ranked trauma surgery (100% vs. 36% academic), basic science (50% vs. 6% academic), neurosurgery (50% vs. 14% academic), and nursing (33% vs. 0% academic) in the top three types of studies conducted. Academic centers were more likely to report non-profit status (86% academic, 50% non-academic) and utilized research funding from external governmental or non-profit grants more often (76% vs 17%).</jats:p>
</jats:sec><jats:sec>
<jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title>
<jats:p>Survey results suggest that academic centers may have more physician, resident, and financial resources available to dedicate to trauma research, which may make fulfillment of ACS level I research requirements easier. Structural and institutional changes at non-academic centers, such as expansion of general surgery resident programs and increased pursuit of external grant funding, may help ensure that academic and non-academic sites are equally equipped to fulfill ACS research criteria.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>