• Media type: E-Article
  • Title: How many key informants are enough? Analysing the validity of the community readiness assessment
  • Contributor: Muellmann, Saskia; Brand, Tilman; Jürgens, Dorothee; Gansefort, Dirk; Zeeb, Hajo
  • imprint: Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2021
  • Published in: BMC Research Notes, 14 (2021) 1
  • Language: English
  • DOI: 10.1186/s13104-021-05497-9
  • ISSN: 1756-0500
  • Keywords: General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology ; General Medicine
  • Origination:
  • Footnote:
  • Description: <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec> <jats:title>Objective</jats:title> <jats:p>Communities are important settings for health promotion and prevention. The community readiness assessment offers a structured approach to assess resources and opportunities to tackle a health problem within a community. The assessment relies on semi-structured interviews with key informants from the communities. A number of 4–6 key informant interviews are recommended in the literature. However, it is unclear whether this is sufficient to obtain a valid representation of the respective community. This study analysed whether increasing the number of key informants from 4–6 to 12–15 alters the results of the community readiness assessment.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>A total of 55 community readiness interviews were carried out in 4 communities. Overall, the community readiness scores showed little variation after having interviewed 10 key informants in a community. However, even after completing 10 interviews in a community, key informants were still able to identify up to 6 new information items regarding community efforts for physical activity promotion among the elderly, contact and communication channel for informing or approaching the target group, or barriers to participation.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
  • Access State: Open Access