Description:
PurposeThis paper seeks to use a multi‐disciplinary approach to analyze past and present economic and social explanations for development phenomena. A number of key factors may be missing from the current paradigm.Design/methodology/approachComparative country surveys of corruption, ownership, freedom, and individualism are analyzed and discussed. Measurements on nine separate indices are evaluated for 97 nations. These interact to form a model labeled the Triad of Strains with three composite axes: ownership‐responsibility, freedom‐actualization, and control‐corruption.FindingsThree theses are suggested from the comparative analyses: without ownership there can be no responsibility, freedom and responsibility go hand‐in‐hand, and unwise use of political control severely undermines economic development.Research limitations/implicationsLimitations include unavailable data for key areas such as North Korea.Practical implicationsImplications are that development policies should promote meaningful private ownership and personal freedom.Originality/valueThis research explores how ownership and freedom critically impact prosperity and provides a more complete, multi‐disciplinary framework for economic development.