Al Koliby, Ibraheem Saleh;
Al-Hakimi, Mohammed A.;
Zaid, Mohammed Abdulrahman Kaid;
Khan, Mohammed Farooque;
Hasan, Murad Baqis;
Alshadadi, Mohammed A.
Green entrepreneurial orientation and technological green innovation: does resources orchestration capability matter?
You can manage bookmarks using lists, please log in to your user account for this.
Media type:
E-Article
Title:
Green entrepreneurial orientation and technological green innovation: does resources orchestration capability matter?
Contributor:
Al Koliby, Ibraheem Saleh;
Al-Hakimi, Mohammed A.;
Zaid, Mohammed Abdulrahman Kaid;
Khan, Mohammed Farooque;
Hasan, Murad Baqis;
Alshadadi, Mohammed A.
Published:
Emerald, 2024
Published in:
The Bottom Line, 37 (2024) 1, Seite 45-70
Language:
English
DOI:
10.1108/bl-06-2023-0199
ISSN:
0888-045X
Origination:
Footnote:
Description:
PurposeAlthough green entrepreneurial orientation (GEO) has received much attention, it is unclear whether it affects technological green innovation (GI). Therefore, this study aims to understand how GEO affects technological GI, with its dimensions green product innovation (GPRODI) and green process innovation (GPROCI), as well as to explore whether resource orchestration capability (ROC) moderates the relationships between them.Design/methodology/approachBased on a cross-sectional survey design, data were gathered from 177 managers of large manufacturing firms in Yemen and analysed using partial least squares structural equation modelling via SmartPLS software.FindingsThe results revealed that GEO positively affects both GPRODI and GPROCI, with a higher effect on GPROCI. Importantly, ROC does, in fact, positively moderate the link between GEO and GPRODI.Research limitations/implicationsThis research adds to knowledge by combining GEO, ROC and technological GI into a unified framework, considering the perspectives of the resource-based view and the resource orchestration theory. However, the study’s use of cross-sectional survey data makes it impossible to infer causes. This is because GEO, ROC and technological GI all have effects on time that this empirical framework cannot account for.Practical implicationsThe findings from this research provide valuable insights for executives and decision makers of large manufacturing companies, who are expected to show increasing interest in adopting ROC into their organisations. This suggests that environmentally-conscious entrepreneurial firms can enhance their GI efforts by embracing ROC.Social implicationsBy adopting the proposed framework, firms can carry out their activities in ways that do not harm environmental and societal well-being, as simply achieving high economic performance is no longer sufficient.Originality/valueTheoretically, the results offer an in-depth understanding of the role of GEO in the technological GI domain by indicating that GEO can promote GPRODI and GPROCI. In addition, the results shed new light on the boundaries of GEO from the perspective of resource orchestration theory. Furthermore, the findings present important insights for managers aiming to enhance their comprehension of leveraging GEO and ROC to foster technological GI.