Description:
This article reconsiders the argument that ‘rituals of rebellion’ be seen as women’s ritual response to everyday patriarchal structures – an argument originally suggested by Gluckman, but recently evoked by Spencer, the Creiders, and others – in light of recent anthropological theorizing on gender. Using as an example one such women’s ritual among the Ihanzu of Tanzania, I show how this particular formulation reduces complex notions of gender and gender practices to unnuanced, monolithic, and all‐encompassing gender‐systems, both in everyday and ritual realms. This it does, first, by conflating gender ideals with gender behaviours and, second, by ignoring people’s conflicting ideas about gender. By problematizing these contradictions, I demonstrate how Ihanzu women’s rites are not about rebellion but gender complementarity, played out by women dancers embodying both genders simultaneously. Above all, this case compels us to rethink, fundamentally, ‘rituals of rebellion’ and ‘patriarchy’.