You can manage bookmarks using lists, please log in to your user account for this.
Media type:
E-Article
Title:
A practical guide to understanding and validating complex models using data simulations
Contributor:
DiRenzo, Graziella V.;
Hanks, Ephraim;
Miller, David A. W.
Published:
Wiley, 2023
Published in:
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 14 (2023) 1, Seite 203-217
Language:
English
DOI:
10.1111/2041-210x.14030
ISSN:
2041-210X
Origination:
Footnote:
Description:
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>
<jats:list>
<jats:list-item><jats:p>Biologists routinely fit novel and complex statistical models to push the limits of our understanding. Examples include, but are not limited to, flexible Bayesian approaches (e.g. BUGS, stan), frequentist and likelihood‐based approaches (e.g. packages <jats:sc>lme4</jats:sc>) and machine learning methods.</jats:p></jats:list-item>
<jats:list-item><jats:p>These software and programs afford the user greater control and flexibility in tailoring complex hierarchical models. However, this level of control and flexibility places a higher degree of responsibility on the user to evaluate the robustness of their statistical inference. To determine how often biologists are running model diagnostics on hierarchical models, we reviewed 50 recently published papers in 2021 in the journal <jats:italic>Nature Ecology & Evolution</jats:italic>, and we found that the majority of published papers did <jats:italic>not</jats:italic> report any validation of their hierarchical models, making it difficult for the reader to assess the robustness of their inference. This lack of reporting likely stems from a lack of standardized guidance for best practices and standard methods.</jats:p></jats:list-item>
<jats:list-item><jats:p>Here, we provide a guide to understanding and validating complex models using data simulations. To determine how often biologists use data simulation techniques, we also reviewed 50 recently published papers in 2021 in the journal <jats:italic>Methods Ecology & Evolution</jats:italic>. We found that 78% of the papers that proposed a new estimation technique, package or model used simulations or generated data in some capacity (18 of 23 papers); but very few of those papers (5 of 23 papers) included either a demonstration that the code could recover realistic estimates for a dataset with known parameters or a demonstration of the statistical properties of the approach. To distil the variety of simulations techniques and their uses, we provide a taxonomy of simulation studies based on the intended inference. We also encourage authors to include a basic validation study whenever novel statistical models are used, which in general, is easy to implement.</jats:p></jats:list-item>
<jats:list-item><jats:p>Simulating data helps a researcher gain a deeper understanding of the models and their assumptions and establish the reliability of their estimation approaches. Wider adoption of data simulations by biologists can improve statistical inference, reliability and open science practices.</jats:p></jats:list-item>
</jats:list>
</jats:p>