Description:
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>To compare the measurements of iridocorneal angle parameters between spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD‐OCT) and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) in dogs.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Animals studied and procedures</jats:title><jats:p>A total of 47 eyes of dogs were scanned at the temporal limbus using SD‐OCT and UBM. Iridocorneal angle (ICA) and angle opening distance (AOD) were measured from the obtained images accordingly. The intra‐observer and inter‐observer reproducibility were evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient. To evaluate intra‐observer reproducibility, measurements of the first and second grading from the first examiner were compared. To evaluate inter‐observer reproducibility, measurements between the two examiners were compared. Agreement between ICA and AOD for SD‐OCT and UBM was evaluated using Bland‐Altman plots.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>In the first grading, the mean ICA and AOD for SD‐OCT were 31.4 ± 6.4° and 641.4 ± 270.8 µm, respectively. The mean ICA and AOD for UBM were 32.0 ± 4.8° and 700.4 ± 238.8 µm, respectively. For ICA and AOD measurements, intra‐observer reproducibility was excellent for both devices, whereas inter‐observer reproducibility was excellent for SD‐OCT and good for UBM. The mean difference in ICA between SD‐OCT and UBM was 0.6° with a limit of agreement (LoA) span of 18.9°. The mean difference in AOD between SD‐OCT and UBM was 58.9 µm with a LoA span of 804.4 µm.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Spectral domain optical coherence tomography is an effective non‐contact imaging modality for the evaluation of canine iridocorneal angle parameters in a clinical setting. Reproducibility of measurements obtained is comparable or superior to UBM, but values obtained by SD‐OCT and UBM for AOD are not interchangeable between devices.</jats:p></jats:sec>