• Media type: E-Article
  • Title: Level‐specific amputations and resulting regenerative outcomes in the mouse distal phalanx
  • Contributor: Chamberlain, Connie S.; Jeffery, Justin J.; Leiferman, Ellen M.; Yildirim, Tugrul; Sun, Xin; Baer, Geoffrey S.; Murphy, William L.; Vanderby, Ray
  • Published: Wiley, 2017
  • Published in: Wound Repair and Regeneration, 25 (2017) 3, Seite 443-453
  • Language: English
  • DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12544
  • ISSN: 1067-1927; 1524-475X
  • Origination:
  • Footnote:
  • Description: AbstractMouse digit tip regeneration involves an intricate coordinated regrowth of the terminal phalanx, nail, dermis and epidermis. During this time, regenerating digits undergo wound healing, blastema formation, and differentiation. However, the regenerative response of the digit is dependent on the level of the amputation. Amputation of <30% of the distal phalanx (P3), with part of the base nail remaining, results in extensive digit regeneration. In contrast, >60% P3 removal results in no regeneration. This level‐dependent regenerative ability of the mouse digit provides a comparative model between regeneration and non‐regeneration that may enable identification of specific factors critical to regeneration. Although the ability to create regenerating and non‐regenerating conditions has been well established, the regenerative response between these regions (“intermediate” zone) has received less scrutiny, and may add insight to the regenerative processes, including the degree of histolysis, and the level of blastema formation. The objective of this study is then to compare the regeneration capacity between amputation levels within the regenerating (<30%), intermediate (40–59%), and non‐regenerating (>60%) regions. Results indicated that regenerative and intermediate amputations led to significant histolysis and blastema formation of the distal phalanx 14 days post‐amputation. Unlike the regenerating digits, intermediate amputations led to incomplete regeneration whereby regrowth of the digits were not to the levels of the intact or regenerating digits. Non‐regenerating amputations did not exhibit significant histolysis or blastema formation. Remarkably, the histolytic process resulted in day 14 P3 lengths that were similar regardless of the initial amputation over 19%. The differences in histolysis, blastema formation and injury outcomes were also marked by changes in the number of proliferating cells and osteoclasts. Altogether, these results indicate that although intermediate amputations result in histolysis and blastema formation similar to regenerating digits, the resulting cellular composition of the blastema differs, contributing to incomplete regeneration.