> Details

Gisselquist, Rachel M.; Justino, Patricia; Vaccaro, Andrea

Do the principles of effective development co‐operation improve development outcomes? The case for clearer definitions and measurement

Reference
management

Bookmarks

Remove from
bookmarks

Share this on Whatsapp

Close

Bookmarks



You can manage bookmarks using lists, please log in to your user account for this.
  • Media type: E-Article
  • Title: Do the principles of effective development co‐operation improve development outcomes? The case for clearer definitions and measurement
  • Contributor: Gisselquist, Rachel M.; Justino, Patricia; Vaccaro, Andrea
  • imprint: Wiley, 2024
  • Published in: Development Policy Review
  • Language: English
  • DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12731
  • ISSN: 0950-6764; 1467-7679
  • Origination:
  • Footnote:
  • Description: <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Motivation</jats:title><jats:p>Elaborated in their current form in Busan in 2011, and reiterated in Geneva in 2022, the four Principles of Effective Development Co‐operation comprise country ownership, focus on results, inclusive partnerships, and transparency and mutual accountability. Framed to guide more effective development assistance, their measurement and impact has not been systematically studied.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose</jats:title><jats:p>We ask, what do we know about adherence to the principles and better development outcomes? What can we learn about this relationship using the Global Partnership for Effective Development Co‐operation's (GPEDC) monitoring framework?</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods and approach</jats:title><jats:p>We define and measure adherence to the four principles using the GPEDC framework and indicators. We then explore the association between these indicators and development outcomes (for example, economic growth and poverty) using correlation, descriptive analysis, and analysis of data quality.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Finding<jats:bold>s</jats:bold></jats:title><jats:p>Across countries, the empirical relationship between the currently available GPEDC data and the development outcomes is tenuous at best. Shortcomings in the data explain much of the lack of evidence. Some shortcomings could be easily fixed with adjustments to the indicators and data collection, but many relate to inherent challenges in measuring the four principles.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Policy implications</jats:title><jats:p>A more precise definition of indicators of adherence to the principles, with a wider coverage of countries and with annual measurement, would help—not necessarily for their instrumental value, but as much, if not more, to raise the profile of the principles themselves. The universally agreed objectives of strengthening international partnerships and co‐operation, as well as of building inclusive, effective, accountable, and transparent institutions as declared in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, are goals well worth pursuing.</jats:p></jats:sec>