Diekmann, Irina;
Blazejak, Katrin;
Krücken, Jürgen;
Strube, Christina;
von Samson‐Himmelstjerna, Georg
Comparison of morphological and molecular Strongylus spp. identification in equine larval cultures and first report of a patent Strongylus asini infection in a horse
You can manage bookmarks using lists, please log in to your user account for this.
Media type:
E-Article
Title:
Comparison of morphological and molecular Strongylus spp. identification in equine larval cultures and first report of a patent Strongylus asini infection in a horse
Contributor:
Diekmann, Irina;
Blazejak, Katrin;
Krücken, Jürgen;
Strube, Christina;
von Samson‐Himmelstjerna, Georg
Published:
Wiley, 2024
Published in:
Equine Veterinary Journal (2024)
Language:
English
DOI:
10.1111/evj.14134
ISSN:
0425-1644;
2042-3306
Origination:
Footnote:
Description:
AbstractBackgroundSurveillance of Strongylus vulgaris and other Strongylus spp. in equids is important for targeted intervention in parasite control, requiring reliable routine diagnostic methods.ObjectivesComparing morphological examination and PCR analyses of larval cultures to identify Strongylus spp. species based on German diagnostic samples from 2018.Study designMethod comparison.MethodsDuring the routine diagnostic investigations, in total 712 strongyle‐egg positive equine faecal samples were cultured. Third‐stage larvae (L3) were morphologically differentiated. For molecular validation, samples were examined using S. vulgaris real‐time PCR and Strongylus edentatus/Strongylus equinus/Strongylus asini high‐resolution melting PCRs.ResultsBased on 28S rRNA PCR, 594 samples positive for nematode DNA were included in the study. The inter‐rater reliability to compare morphological and molecular species identification was fair for Strongylus spp. without species identification and for S. edentatus, slight for S. equinus and poor for S. vulgaris. The frequency based on morphological and molecular data in this study were for S. vulgaris 0% and 0.8%, respectively, for S. edentatus 0.3% and 1.5%, respectively, and for S. equinus 2.0% and 0.2%, respectively. Based on molecular analyses, one sample obtained from a domestic horse contained S. asini DNA, which was confirmed by sequencing.Main limitationsFor many samples, no or only incomplete data regarding clinical history, the exact geographical location and whether samples were obtained on individual or farm level, were available.ConclusionsResults of morphological and molecular examination methods of strongyle L3 from equine samples can differ substantially. Further evaluation of these methods is required to provide reliable and cost‐effective methods of screening equine parasites. Further studies using approaches suitable to detect S. asini are needed to evaluate its clinical and epidemiological relevance.