You can manage bookmarks using lists, please log in to your user account for this.
Media type:
E-Article
Title:
Optimized Pulse Durations Minimize the Effect of Polarity Reversal on Defibrillation Efficacy with Biphasic Shocks
Contributor:
SCHAUERTE, PATRICK;
SCHÖNDUBE, FRIEDRICH A.;
GROSSMANN, MARIUS;
MESSMER, BRUNO J.;
HANRATH, PETER;
STELLBRINK, CHRISTOPH
Published:
Wiley, 1999
Published in:
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 22 (1999) 5, Seite 790-797
Language:
English
DOI:
10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00545.x
ISSN:
0147-8389;
1540-8159
Origination:
Footnote:
Description:
There are conflicting results on the effect of polarity change on the defibrillation efficacy of biphasic shocks possibly caused by different shock durations. The goal of the present study was to investigate the influence of polarity reversal on defibrillation efficacy for different biphasic shock durations in a porcine animal model. In eight anesthesized pigs using a transvenous/submuscular lead system DFTs for 4 phase 1 durations were determined: 8.1 ms, 6 ms, 3.8 ms and 1.7 ms. The phase 1/phase 2 ratio was constant at 60%/40%. For cathodal shocks, the defibrillation coil in the right ventricular apex was the cathode during phase 1 and for anodal shocks it was the anode. For both polarities, the strength‐duration curve revealed a DFT minimum at 3.8 ms (cathodal shocks: 21.3 ± 6.4 J, P < 0.001; anodal shocks: 21.9 ± 8 J, P = 0.05). For anodal shocks and phase 1 durations of 1.7, 3.8, and 6 ms there was no significant difference of the stored energy at the DFT compared to cathodal shocks. In contrast, significantly lower DFTs were observed for anodal shocks with a phase 1 duration of 8.1 ms (28.8 ± 6.4 J compared to 33.1 ± 5.9 J for cathodal shocks, P = 0.006). The effect of lower defibrillation energy requirements with polarity reversal depends on the total biphasic shock duration; for the pulse duration with the lowest DFT, polarity reversal does not increase defibrillation efficacy of biphasic shocks.