O'Connell, Dylan P.;
Thomas, David H.;
Dou, Tai H.;
Lamb, James M.;
Feingold, Franklin;
Low, Daniel A.;
Fuld, Matthew K.;
Sieren, Jered P.;
Sloan, Chelsea M.;
Shirk, Melissa A.;
Hoffman, Eric A.;
Hofmann, Christian
Comparison of breathing gated CT images generated using a 5DCT technique and a commercial clinical protocol in a porcine model
You can manage bookmarks using lists, please log in to your user account for this.
Media type:
E-Article
Title:
Comparison of breathing gated CT images generated using a 5DCT technique and a commercial clinical protocol in a porcine model
Contributor:
O'Connell, Dylan P.;
Thomas, David H.;
Dou, Tai H.;
Lamb, James M.;
Feingold, Franklin;
Low, Daniel A.;
Fuld, Matthew K.;
Sieren, Jered P.;
Sloan, Chelsea M.;
Shirk, Melissa A.;
Hoffman, Eric A.;
Hofmann, Christian
Published:
Wiley, 2015
Published in:
Medical Physics, 42 (2015) 7, Seite 4033-4042
Description:
<jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose:</jats:title><jats:p>To demonstrate that a “5DCT” technique which utilizes fast helical acquisition yields the same respiratory‐gated images as a commercial technique for regular, mechanically produced breathing cycles.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods:</jats:title><jats:p>Respiratory‐gated images of an anesthetized, mechanically ventilated pig were generated using a Siemens low‐pitch helical protocol and 5DCT for a range of breathing rates and amplitudes and with standard and low dose imaging protocols. 5DCT reconstructions were independently evaluated by measuring the distances between tissue positions predicted by a 5D motion model and those measured using deformable registration, as well by reconstructing the originally acquired scans. Discrepancies between the 5DCT and commercial reconstructions were measured using landmark correspondences.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results:</jats:title><jats:p>The mean distance between model predicted tissue positions and deformably registered tissue positions over the nine datasets was 0.65 ± 0.28 mm. Reconstructions of the original scans were on average accurate to 0.78 ± 0.57 mm. Mean landmark displacement between the commercial and 5DCT images was 1.76 ± 1.25 mm while the maximum lung tissue motion over the breathing cycle had a mean value of 27.2 ± 4.6 mm. An image composed of the average of 30 deformably registered images acquired with a low dose protocol had 6 HU image noise (single standard deviation) in the heart versus 31 HU for the commercial images.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions:</jats:title><jats:p>An end to end evaluation of the 5DCT technique was conducted through landmark based comparison to breathing gated images acquired with a commercial protocol under highly regular ventilation. The techniques were found to agree to within 2 mm for most respiratory phases and most points in the lung.</jats:p></jats:sec>