• Media type: E-Article
  • Title: Loudness enhancement and intensity discrimination under forward and backward masking
  • Contributor: Plack, Christopher J.
  • imprint: Acoustical Society of America (ASA), 1996
  • Published in: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • Language: English
  • DOI: 10.1121/1.416288
  • ISSN: 0001-4966; 1520-8524
  • Keywords: Acoustics and Ultrasonics ; Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Origination:
  • Footnote:
  • Description: <jats:p>There is a large deterioration in intensity discrimination performance at medium levels for a 30-ms sinusoidal pedestal presented 100 ms before or 100 ms after an intense masker [Plack and Viemeister, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92, 3097–3101 (1992)]. It has also been demonstrated that the loudness of a 30-ms sinusoidal tone burst, presented 100 ms after a masking tone burst, is enhanced at mid-levels [Zeng, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96, 2127–2131 (1994)]. The present experiment measured intensity discrimination and loudness enhancement in both forward and backward masking. A double-staircase adaptive procedure was used to match the loudness of a 30-ms, 1-kHz standard sinusoid presented in quiet to the loudness of a 30-ms, 1-kHz sinusoid presented 100 ms after (forward masking) or 100 ms before (backward masking) a 110-ms, 90-dB, 1-kHz masking sinusoid. The mean of the thresholds from the two staircases was used to determine the amount of enhancement, and the difference between the thresholds from the two staircases was used to determine the intensity just noticeable difference (jnd). Four listeners were tested at a range of standard levels between 30 and 90 dB. For all listeners, in both forward and backward masking, the jnd and loudness were greatest at mid-levels (40–70 dB). For a given listener, there was no substantial difference between the form of the results under forward compared to backward masking, although there was considerable variability in the size of the effects between the individual listeners. Combining all the data, for both forward and backward masking there was a positive correlation between the size of the jnd and the magnitude of the loudness enhancement, although the correlation was only significant in backward masking (p&amp;lt;0.005). Taken with the results of Zeng, these data suggest a link between loudness enhancement and the jnd increase, and a link between the mechanisms underlying the effects of forward and backward masking on intensity discrimination. It is suggested that all these effects may be caused by long-term loudness integration in the auditory system.</jats:p>