• Media type: E-Article
  • Title: Occupational differences in the prevalence and severity of long-COVID: analysis of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Infection Survey
  • Contributor: Kromydas, Theocharis; Demou, Evangelia; Edge, Rhiannon; Gittins, Matthew; Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal; Pearce, Neil; van Tongeren, Martie; Wilkinson, Jack; Rhodes, Sarah
  • imprint: BMJ, 2023
  • Published in: Occupational and Environmental Medicine
  • Language: English
  • DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2023-108930
  • ISSN: 1470-7926; 1351-0711
  • Keywords: Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Origination:
  • Footnote:
  • Description: <jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives</jats:title><jats:p>To establish whether prevalence and severity of long-COVID symptoms vary by industry and occupation.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>We used Office for National Statistics COVID-19 Infection Survey (CIS) data (February 2021–April 2022) of working-age participants (16–65 years). Exposures were industry, occupation and major Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) group. Outcomes were self-reported: (1) long-COVID symptoms and (2) reduced function due to long-COVID. Binary (outcome 1) and ordered (outcome 2) logistic regression were used to estimate odds ratios (OR)and prevalence (marginal means).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Public facing industries, including teaching and education, social care, healthcare, civil service, retail and transport industries and occupations, had the highest likelihood of long-COVID. By major SOC group, those in caring, leisure and other services (OR 1.44, 95% CIs 1.38 to 1.52) had substantially elevated odds than average. For almost all exposures, the pattern of ORs for long-COVID symptoms followed SARS-CoV-2 infections, except for professional occupations (eg, some healthcare, education, scientific occupations) (infection: OR&lt;1 ; long-COVID: OR&gt;1). The probability of reporting long-COVID for industry ranged from 7.7% (financial services) to 11.6% (teaching and education); whereas the prevalence of reduced function by ‘a lot’ ranged from 17.1% (arts, entertainment and recreation) to 22%–23% (teaching and education and armed forces) and to 27% (not working).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>The risk and prevalence of long-COVID differs across industries and occupations. Generally, it appears that likelihood of developing long-COVID symptoms follows likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 infection, except for professional occupations. These findings highlight sectors and occupations where further research is needed to understand the occupational factors resulting in long-COVID.</jats:p></jats:sec>