First results for Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group (AGITG) control net study: Phase II study of 177Lu-octreotate peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (LuTate PRRT) +/- capecitabine, temozolomide (CAPTEM) for midgut neuroendocrine tumors (mNETs).

Media type: E-Article

Title: First results for Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group (AGITG) control net study: Phase II study of 177Lu-octreotate peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (LuTate PRRT) +/- capecitabine, temozolomide (CAPTEM) for midgut neuroendocrine tumors (mNETs)

Contributor: Pavlakis, Nick; Ransom, David Turner; Wyld, David; Sjoquist, Katrin Marie; Asher, Rebecca; Gebski, Val; Wilson, Kate; Kiberu, Andrew Ddembe; Burge, Matthew E.; Macdonald, William; Roach, Paul; Pattison, David A; Butler, Patrick; Price, Timothy Jay; Michael, Michael; Lawrence, Benjamin James; Bailey, Dale L.; Leyden, John Charles; Zalcberg, John Raymond; Turner, J. Harvey

imprint: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2020

Language: English

DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.4_suppl.604

ISSN: 0732-183X; 1527-7755

Keywords: Cancer Research ; Oncology

Origination:

Footnote:

Description: 604 Background: Single agent 177Lu-octreotate peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is now a standard of care for progressive mNETS. High activity was seen with LuTate and concurrent CAPTEM chemotherapy in a single arm Phase I/II trial. This study was undertaken to determine the relative activity of adding CAPTEM to LuTate PRRT in patients with mNETs. Methods: Non-comparative randomised open label phase II trial of PRRT +/- CAPTEM in patients with mNETs, with 2:1 randomisation: PRRT /CAPTEM (experimental arm) vs. PRRT (control). PRRT /CAPTEM: 7.8GBq LuTate day(D) 10, 8 weekly (wkly) x 4, with b.i.d. oral CAP 750mg/m2 D1-14 & TEM 75mg/m2 D10-14, 8 wkly x 4, vs. PRRT 8 wkly x 4. Primary endpoint: progression free survival (PFS) at 15 months assuming 15 month PFS of 66.4% in the control arm, aiming for PFS rate > 80%; secondary endpoints: objective tumour response rate (complete or partial response) (OTRR), clinical benefit rate (complete or partial response, stable disease) (CBR), toxicity, and QOL. Results: 47 patients enrolled (Dec 2015 - Feb 2018): 33 PRRT/CAPTEM and 14 PRRT. Two patients withdrew prior to treatment. Patient characteristics were balanced except gender (female 58% vs. 14%). Two patients received 2 prior systemic regimens. After a median follow-up of 32 months, the 15 month PFS was 90% (95% CI: 73-97%) v 92% (95% CI: 57-99%); OTRR 25% vs 15%; and CBR 97% vs 92% for PRRT/CAPTEM v PRRT respectively. For treatment related adverse events 22/32 CAPTEM patients experienced one Grade 3 event (69%) vs 5/13 (38%, PRRT); 4/32 pts experienced one Grade 4 event (13%) v 1/13 (8%) respectively. Only one patient failed to complete therapy due to toxicity (PRRT/CAPTEM). Conclusions: This initial planned analysis demonstrates similarly high 15 month PFS for CAPTEM/PRRT relative to PRRT alone. OTRR is numerically higher but at the cost of greater toxicity. Longer follow up is required to determine if the activity of PRRT/CAPTEM is sufficient to warrant Phase III evaluation. Clinical trial information: ACTRN12615000909527.

Access State: Open Access

Search in field:

Recently searched for: