> Details
Scott, Eleanor M.;
Feig, Denice S.;
Murphy, Helen R.;
Law, Graham R.;
Murphy, Helen;
Grisoni, Jeannie;
Byrne, Carolyn;
Neoh, Sandra;
Davenport, Katy;
Donovan, Lois;
Gougeon, Claire;
Oldford, Carolyn;
Young, Catherine;
Amiel, Stephanie;
Hunt, Katharine;
Green, Louisa;
Rogers, Helen;
Rossi, Benedetta;
Feig, Denice;
Cleave, Barbara;
Strom, Michelle;
Corcoy, Rosa;
de Leiva, Alberto;
Adelantado, Juan María;
[...]
Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pregnancy: Importance of Analyzing Temporal Profiles to Understand Clinical Outcomes
Sharing
Reference
management
Direct link
Bookmarks
Remove from
bookmarks
Share this by email
Share this on Twitter
Share this on Facebook
Share this on Whatsapp
- Media type: E-Article
- Title: Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pregnancy: Importance of Analyzing Temporal Profiles to Understand Clinical Outcomes
- Contributor: Scott, Eleanor M.; Feig, Denice S.; Murphy, Helen R.; Law, Graham R.; Murphy, Helen; Grisoni, Jeannie; Byrne, Carolyn; Neoh, Sandra; Davenport, Katy; Donovan, Lois; Gougeon, Claire; Oldford, Carolyn; Young, Catherine; Amiel, Stephanie; Hunt, Katharine; Green, Louisa; Rogers, Helen; Rossi, Benedetta; Feig, Denice; Cleave, Barbara; Strom, Michelle; Corcoy, Rosa; de Leiva, Alberto; Adelantado, Juan María; [...]
-
Published:
American Diabetes Association, 2020
- Published in: Diabetes Care, 43 (2020) 6, Seite 1178-1184
- Language: English
- DOI: 10.2337/dc19-2527
- ISSN: 0149-5992; 1935-5548
- Origination:
- Footnote:
- Description: OBJECTIVE To determine if temporal glucose profiles differed between 1) women who were randomized to real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) or self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG), 2) women who used insulin pumps or multiple daily insulin injections (MDIs), and 3) women whose infants were born large for gestational age (LGA) or not, by assessing CGM data obtained from the Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Women With Type 1 Diabetes in Pregnancy Trial (CONCEPTT). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Standard summary metrics and functional data analysis (FDA) were applied to CGM data from the CONCEPTT trial (RT-CGM, n = 100; SMBG, n = 100) taken at baseline and at 24- and 34-weeks’ gestation. Multivariable regression analysis determined if temporal differences in 24-h glucose profiles occurred between comparators in each of the three groups. RESULTS FDA revealed that women using RT-CGM had significantly lower glucose (0.4–0.8 mmol/L [7–14 mg/dL]) for 7 h/day (0800 h to 1200 h and 1600 h to 1900 h) compared with those with SMBG. Women using pumps had significantly higher glucose (0.4–0.9 mmol/L [7–16 mg/dL]) for 12 h/day (0300 h to 0600 h, 1300 h to 1800 h, and 2030 h to 0030 h) at 24 weeks with no difference at 34 weeks compared with MDI. Women who had an LGA infant ran a significantly higher glucose by 0.4–0.7 mmol/L (7–13 mg/dL) for 4.5 h/day at baseline, by 0.4–0.9 mmol/L (7–16 mg/dL) for 16 h/day at 24 weeks, and by 0.4–0.7 mmol/L (7–13 mg/dL) for 14 h/day at 34 weeks. CONCLUSIONS FDA of temporal glucose profiles gives important information about differences in glucose control and its timing, which are undetectable by standard summary metrics. Women using RT-CGM were able to achieve better daytime glucose control, reducing fetal exposure to maternal glucose.
- Access State: Open Access