Patient's Perception of Digital Symptom Assessment Technologies in Rheumatology: Results From a Multicentre Study

Media type: E-Article
Title: Patient's Perception of Digital Symptom Assessment Technologies in Rheumatology: Results From a Multicentre Study
Contributor: Knitza, Johannes; Muehlensiepen, Felix; Ignatyev, Yuriy; Fuchs, Franziska; Mohn, Jacob; Simon, David; Kleyer, Arnd; Fagni, Filippo; Boeltz, Sebastian; Morf, Harriet; Bergmann, Christina; Labinsky, Hannah; Vorbrüggen, Wolfgang; Ramming, Andreas; Distler, Jörg H. W.; Bartz-Bazzanella, Peter; Vuillerme, Nicolas; Schett, Georg; Welcker, Martin; Hueber, Axel J.
imprint: Frontiers Media SA, 2022
Published in: Frontiers in Public Health
Language: Not determined
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.844669
ISSN: 2296-2565
Keywords: Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Origination:
Footnote:
Description: <jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction</jats:title><jats:p>An increasing number of digital tools, including dedicated diagnostic decision support systems (DDSS) exist to better assess new symptoms and understand when and where to seek medical care. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient's previous online assessment experiences and to compare the acceptability, usability, usefulness and potential impact of artificial intelligence (AI)-based symptom checker (Ada) and an online questionnaire-based self-referral tool (Rheport).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Materials and Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Patients newly presenting to three German secondary rheumatology outpatient clinics were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to complete consecutively Ada or Rheport in a prospective non-blinded multicentre controlled crossover randomized trial. DDSS completion time was recorded by local study personnel and perceptions on DDSS and previous online assessment were collected through a self-completed study questionnaire, including usability measured with the validated System Usability Scale (SUS).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>600 patients (median age 52 years, 418 women) were included. 277/600 (46.2%) of patients used an online search engine prior to the appointment. The median time patients spent assessing symptoms was 180, 7, and 8 min, respectively using online using search engines, Ada and Rheport. 111/275 (40.4%), 266/600 (44.3%) and 395/600 (65.8%) of patients rated the respective symptom assessment as very helpful or helpful, using online search engines, Ada and Rheport, respectively. Usability of both diagnostic decision support systems (DDSS) was “good” with a significantly higher mean SUS score (SD) of Rheport 77.1/100 (16.0) compared to Ada 74.4/100 (16.8), (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.0001). In male patients, usability of Rheport was rated higher than Ada (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.02) and the usability rating of older (52 years ≥) patients of both DDSS was lower than in younger participants (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.005). Both effects were independent of each other. 440/600 (73.3%) and 475/600 (79.2%) of the patients would recommend Ada and Rheport to friends and other patients, respectively.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>In summary, patients increasingly assess their symptoms independently online, however only a minority used dedicated symptom assessment websites or DDSS. DDSS, such as Ada an Rheport are easy to use, well accepted among patients with musculoskeletal complaints and could replace online search engines for patient symptom assessment, potentially saving time and increasing helpfulness.</jats:p></jats:sec>
Access State: Open Access

Search in field:

Recently searched for: