You can manage bookmarks using lists, please log in to your user account for this.
Media type:
E-Article
Title:
Causal Effects of Prenatal Exposure to PM2.5 on Child Development and the Role of Unobserved Confounding
Contributor:
Tozzi, Viola;
Lertxundi, Aitana;
Ibarluzea, Jesus M.;
Baccini, Michela
Published:
MDPI AG, 2019
Published in:
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16 (2019) 22, Seite 4381
Language:
English
DOI:
10.3390/ijerph16224381
ISSN:
1660-4601
Origination:
Footnote:
Description:
Prenatal exposure to airborne particles is a potential risk factor for infant neuropsychological development. This issue is usually explored by regression analysis under the implicit assumption that all relevant confounders are accounted for. Our aim is to estimate the causal effect of prenatal exposure to high concentrations of airborne particles with a diameter < 2.5 µm (PM2.5) on children’s psychomotor and mental scores in a birth cohort from Gipuzkoa (Spain), and investigate the robustness of the results to possible unobserved confounding. We adopted the propensity score matching approach and performed sensitivity analyses comparing the actual effect estimates with those obtained after adjusting for unobserved confounders simulated to have different strengths. On average, mental and psychomotor scores decreased of −2.47 (90% CI: −7.22; 2.28) and −3.18 (90% CI: −7.61; 1.25) points when the prenatal exposure was ≥17 μg/m3 (median). These estimates were robust to the presence of unmeasured confounders having strength similar to that of the observed ones. The plausibility of having omitted a confounder strong enough to drive the estimates to zero was poor. The sensitivity analyses conferred solidity to our findings, despite the large sampling variability. This kind of sensitivity analysis should be routinely implemented in observational studies, especially in exploring new relationships.