• Media type: E-Article
  • Title: Automatic Detection of Daytime Sea Fog Based on Supervised Classification Techniques for FY-3D Satellite
  • Contributor: Wang, Yu; Qiu, Zhongfeng; Zhao, Dongzhi; Ali, Md. Arfan; Hu, Chenyue; Zhang, Yuanzhi; Liao, Kuo
  • imprint: MDPI AG, 2023
  • Published in: Remote Sensing
  • Language: English
  • DOI: 10.3390/rs15092283
  • ISSN: 2072-4292
  • Keywords: General Earth and Planetary Sciences
  • Origination:
  • Footnote:
  • Description: <jats:p>Polar-orbiting satellites have been widely used for detecting sea fog because of their wide coverage and high spatial and spectral resolution. FengYun-3D (FY-3D) is a Chinese satellite that provides global sea fog observation. From January 2021 to October 2022, the backscatter and virtual file manager products from CALIPSO (Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation) were used to label samples of different atmospheric conditions in FY-3D images, including clear sky, sea fog, low stratus, fog below low stratus, mid–high-level clouds, and fog below the mid–high-level clouds. A 13-dimensional feature matrix was constructed after extracting and analyzing the spectral and texture features of these samples. In order to detect daytime sea fog using a 13-dimensional feature matrix and CALIPSO sample labels, four supervised classification models were developed, including Decision Tree (DT), Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and Neural Network. The accuracy of each model was evaluated and compared using a 10-fold cross-validation procedure. The study found that the SVM, KNN, and Neural Network performed equally well in identifying low stratus, with 85% to 86% probability of detection (POD). As well as identifying the basic components of sea fog, the SVM model demonstrated the highest POD (93.8%), while the KNN had the lowest POD (92.4%). The study concludes that the SVM, KNN, and Neural Network can effectively distinguish sea fog from low stratus. The models, however, were less effective at detecting sub-cloud fog, with only 11.6% POD for fog below low stratus, and 57.4% POD for fog below mid–high-level clouds. In light of this, future research should focus on improving sub-cloud fog detection by considering cloud layers.</jats:p>
  • Access State: Open Access