• Media type: E-Article
  • Title: Methodological Nationalism in Global Studies and Beyond
  • Contributor: Koos, Agnes Katalin; Keulman, Kenneth
  • Published: MDPI AG, 2019
  • Published in: Social Sciences, 8 (2019) 12, Seite 327
  • Language: English
  • DOI: 10.3390/socsci8120327
  • ISSN: 2076-0760
  • Keywords: General Social Sciences
  • Origination:
  • Footnote:
  • Description: <jats:p>Global studies, or the study of globalization, is a diverse field of research, with different disciplinary focuses and with some national versions. Russian Alexander Chumakov constructed it as a philosophical discipline, while in U.S. academia it is considered an empirical inquiry at the intersection of area studies, international studies, and international relations. This paper focuses on American global studies, pointing out the heavy epistemological burden it inherited from the field of knowledge dominated by international relations, which enshrines both methodological and political nationalism. International relations makes claims to be the sole theory originator in this field, but it may be criticized for several methodological and ethical issues (such as unwarranted simplifications that purge empirical contents to the point of unfalsifiability, antiquated epistemic ideals, Western and hegemonic biases, besides methodological nationalism), thus alternate theorizations are highly desirable.</jats:p>
  • Access State: Open Access