You can manage bookmarks using lists, please log in to your user account for this.
Media type:
E-Article
Title:
Unexpected cases in field diagnosis of African swine fever virus in Vietnam: The needs consideration when performing molecular diagnostic tests
Contributor:
Truong, Anh Duc;
Ly, Duc Viet;
Vu, Thi Hao;
Hoang, Van Tuan;
Nguyen, Thi Chinh;
Chu, Thi Nhu;
Nguyen, Huyen Thi;
Nguyen, The Vinh;
Pham, Ngoc Thi;
Tran, Ha Thi Thanh;
Dang, Hoang Vu
imprint:
ScopeMed, 2020
Published in:Open Veterinary Journal
Language:
Not determined
DOI:
10.4314/ovj.v10i2.8
ISSN:
2218-6050;
2226-4485
Origination:
Footnote:
Description:
<jats:p>Background: The first confirmed case of African swine fever (ASF) in Vietnam was reported officially in February 2019. To date, ASF virus (ASFV) have been detected in 63/63 provinces in Vietnam. Currently, real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is considered to be a powerful tool for viral detection in field samples, including ASFV. However, some recent reports have suggested that mismatches in primer and probe binding regions may directly affect real-time PCR qualification, leading a false-negative result.Aim: This study aims to further examine a conflicting result obtained from two OIE recommended methods, conventional PCR and real-time PCR, for ASFV detection.Methods: Two ASF suspected pigs from different provinces in the north of Vietnam were selected for this study based on clinical signs and postmortem lesions. The different results obtained by OIE-recommended conventional PCR and real-time PCR were further analyzed by the Sanger sequencing method and virus isolation in combination with hemadsorption (HAD) test using porcine alveolar macrophages cells.Results: The results showed that when the primer sequence matched perfectly with the sequences of field isolates, a mutation in probe binding region was found, indicating that a single mismatch in the probe binding site may cause a false-negative result by real-time PCR in detecting ASFV in clinical samples in Vietnam. An agreement between conventional PCR, using PPA1/PPA2 primers and two golden standard methods, virus isolation in combination with HAD assay, and sequencing method was observed in this study.Conclusion: A single mismatch in the probe binding site caused a failse-negative result by realtime PCR method in field diagnosis of ASFV. The needs consideration when selecting the appropriate molecular diagnostic methods is based on the current databases of ASFV sequences, particularly for epidemiological surveillance of ASF.
Keywords: African swine fever, PCR, Pigs, Real-time PCR, Vietnam</jats:p>