You can manage bookmarks using lists, please log in to your user account for this.
Media type:
E-Article
Title:
The Role of Forgetting in the Commemorative Practices with the Example of the 750 Years of Berlin in the German Democratic Republic in 1987
Contributor:
GOUDIN-STEINMANN, Elisa
imprint:
Universite Clermont Auvergne, 2017
Published in:K@iros
Language:
Not determined
DOI:
10.52497/kairos.269
ISSN:
2492-1599
Origination:
Footnote:
Description:
<jats:p>The archives of the Berliner Haus für kulturelle Arbeit, an institution of the GDR charged in the 1980s to prepare the 750 years commemoration of the birth of the city Berlin, show that a lapse of memory played a significant role in the production of the past which characterized this commemoration, that we analyze, within the meaning of Paul Connerton, as a set of “commemorative practices” which form the social support of the common memory. The typical case of the GDR where the memory is shared with West-Germany is interessant, because these ceremonies are significant by their assertions but also by their silences. We show how a lapse of memory was built in the GDR, and how this lapse of memory prescribed by the Berliner House of cultural work aimed at developping a feeling of common membership, an identification with the east-german State and with the socialist ideology, while overlooking of broad sides of history. Some categories of analysis of the family memory are transposed: whereas in the case of the family memory, the rewriting of history obeys a tacit law which is that of the family unit to preserve, memory construction in the case of the Berliner House of cultural work also rests on a unit to consolidate: a national unit. The corollary of this instrumentalisation of the past is that it was necessary to describe a linear historical evolution, with a direction and a sense of history. The objective was to promote a teleological approach of history, guided by the principles of the historical materialism. However, we also show that marginal critical voices could sometimes appear, in order to denounce the aporias of this speech on the past.</jats:p>