You can manage bookmarks using lists, please log in to your user account for this.
Media type:
E-Article
Title:
Estimating food resource availability in arid environments with Sentinel 2 satellite imagery
Contributor:
Funghi, Caterina;
Heim, René H.J.;
Schuett, Wiebke;
Griffith, Simon C.;
Oldeland, Jens
imprint:
PeerJ, 2020
Published in:PeerJ
Language:
English
DOI:
10.7717/peerj.9209
ISSN:
2167-8359
Origination:
Footnote:
Description:
<jats:sec>
<jats:title>Background</jats:title>
<jats:p>In arid environments, plant primary productivity is generally low and highly variable both spatially and temporally. Resources are not evenly distributed in space and time (e.g., soil nutrients, water), and depend on global (El Niño/ Southern Oscillation) and local climate parameters. The launch of the Sentinel2-satellite, part of the European Copernicus program, has led to the provision of freely available data with a high spatial resolution (10 m per pixel). Here, we aimed to test whether Sentinel2-imagery can be used to quantify the spatial variability of a minor tussock grass (<jats:italic>Enneapogon</jats:italic> spp.) in an Australian arid area and whether we can identify different vegetation cover (e.g., grass from shrubs) along different temporal scenarios. Although short-lasting, the <jats:italic>Enneapogon</jats:italic> grassland has been identified as a key primary food source to animals in the arid environment. If we are able to identify and monitor the productivity of this species remotely, it will provide an important new tool for examining food resource dynamics and subsequent animal responses to them in arid habitat.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>
<jats:sec>
<jats:title>Methods</jats:title>
<jats:p>We combined field vegetation surveys and Sentinel2-imagery to test if satellite spectral data can predict the spatial variability of <jats:italic>Enneapogon</jats:italic> over time, through GLMMs. Additionally, a cluster analysis (‘gower’ distance, ‘complete’ method), based on <jats:italic>Enneapogon</jats:italic> seed-productivity, and total vegetation cover in October 2016, identified three clusters: bare ground, grass dominated and shrub dominated. We compared the vegetation indices between these different clusters from October 2016 to January 2017.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>
<jats:sec>
<jats:title>Results</jats:title>
<jats:p>We found that MSAVI<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> and NDVI correlated with the proportion of <jats:italic>Enneapogon</jats:italic> with seeds across the landscape and this relationship changed over time. Both vegetation indices (MSAVI<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> and NDVI) were higher in patches with high seed-productivity of <jats:italic>Enneapogon</jats:italic> than in bare soil, but only in October, a climatically-favorable period during which this dominant grass reached peak seed-productivity.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>
<jats:sec>
<jats:title>Discussion</jats:title>
<jats:p>MSAVI<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> and NDVI provided reliable estimates of the heterogeneity of vegetation type across the landscape only when measured in the Austral spring. This means that grass cover is related to seed-productivity and it is possible to remotely and reliably predict food resource availability in arid habitat, but only in certain conditions. The lack of significant differences between clusters in the summer was likely driven by the short-lasting nature of the vegetation in the study and the sparseness of the grass-dominated vegetation, in contrast to the shrub vegetation cluster that was particularly well measured by the NDVI.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>
<jats:sec>
<jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title>
<jats:p>Overall, our study highlights the potential for Sentinel2-imagery to estimate and monitor the change in grass seed availability remotely in arid environments. However, heterogeneity in grassland cover is not as reliably measured as other types of vegetation and may only be well detected during periods of peak productivity (e.g., October 2016).</jats:p>
</jats:sec>