You can manage bookmarks using lists, please log in to your user account for this.
Media type:
E-Article
Title:
Do We Really Need a New 'Constructivist Institutionalism' to Explain Institutional Change?
Contributor:
BELL, STEPHEN
imprint:
Cambridge University Press, 2011
Published in:British Journal of Political Science
Language:
English
DOI:
10.1017/S0007123411000147
ISSN:
0007-1234;
1469-2112
Origination:
Footnote:
Description:
<p>Rational choice, historical institutionalism and sociological institutionalism are under criticism from a new 'constructivist institutionalism' – with critics claiming that established positions cannot explain institutional change effectively, because agents are highly constrained by their institutional environments. These alleged problems in explaining institutional change are exaggerated and can be dealt with by using a suitably tailored historical institutionalism. This places active, interpretive agents at the centre of analysis, in institutional settings modelled as more flexible than those found in 'sticky' versions of historical institutionalism. This alternative approach also absorbs core elements of constructivism in explaining institutional change. The article concludes with empirical illustrations, mainly from Australian politics, of the key claims about how agents operate within institutions with 'bounded discretion', and how institutional environments can shape and even empower agency in change processes.</p>