• Media type: E-Article
  • Title: Botanical Nomenclature and Plant Fossils
  • Contributor: Cleal, Christopher J.; Thomas, Barry A.
  • imprint: International Bureau for Plant Taxonomy, 2010
  • Published in: Taxon
  • Language: English
  • ISSN: 0040-0262
  • Keywords: Nomenclature
  • Origination:
  • Footnote:
  • Description: <p>The provisions in the Code for naming plant fossil taxa have changed subsantially over the years. The history of these changes reflects the tension between palaeobotanists (including palynologists studying plant microfossils) who need a flexible set of regulations, and the tendency for the Code to include nomenclatural regulations that constrain taxonomic decisions. The current Vienna Code now provides for plant fossils to be named as fossil taxa, which is a flexible taxonomic concept that should suit the needs of most palaeobotanists. However, the Vienna Code also incorporates the more restrictive concept of morphotaxa and most palaeobotanists seem ot be under the misapprehension that plant fossisl can only be named as morphotaxa. In our view, the concept of morphotaxa is logically flawed and unnecessary in practice, and should be removed from the Code.</p>