Footnote:
Veröffentlichungsversion
begutachtet (peer reviewed)
In: Raumforschung und Raumordnung / Spatial Research and Planning ; 79 (2021) 4 ; 424-437
Description:
Sustainability-oriented real-world laboratories involve the co-design and co-creation of knowledge, based on a trans- disciplinary cooperation between actors from different social worlds-academia,theadministration,business,civilsociety- each endowed with specific interests, resources and world- views. Sustainability-oriented real-world laboratories claim to be a means of inclusive participation in the co-creative shaping of solutions for socioecological issues and exploring pathways to sustainability. In the literature dealing with sus- tainability-oriented real-world laboratories, participation is thus mainly understood as active involvement by civil society, change agents and citizens in processes of experimentation and the implementation of solutions. We call this co-creative participation. However, participation in talk-based opinion formation and decision-making processes - we call this de- liberative participation - is hardly discussed in the respective literature. In this paper, we argue that co-creative and delib- erative participation are two forms of participation which can be conceptualized differently but which are both relevant for successful experimentation in sustainability-oriented real- world laboratories and are mainly intertwined in practice. We propose an ideal-typical conceptual framework for par- ticipation in sustainability-oriented real-world laboratories that combines co-creative and deliberative participation. The aim is to contribute to a systematization of, and rationale for, different forms of participation in real-world laboratories.