Balakrishnan, Uttara
[Verfasser:in]
;
Haushofer, Johannes
[Sonstige Person, Familie und Körperschaft];
Jakiela, Pamela
[Sonstige Person, Familie und Körperschaft]National Bureau of Economic Research
How Soon Is Now? Evidence of Present Bias from Convex Time Budget Experiments
Erschienen:
Cambridge, Mass: National Bureau of Economic Research, June 2017
Erschienen in:NBER working paper series ; no. w23558
Umfang:
1 Online-Ressource
Sprache:
Englisch
DOI:
10.3386/w23558
Identifikator:
Reproduktionsnotiz:
Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
Entstehung:
Anmerkungen:
Mode of access: World Wide Web
System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files
Beschreibung:
Empirically observed intertemporal choices about money have long been thought to exhibit present bias, i.e. higher short-term compared to long-term discount rates. Recently, this view has been called into question on both empirical and theoretical grounds, and a spate of recent findings suggest that present bias for money is minimal or non-existent when one allows for curvature in the utility function and transaction costs are tightly controlled. However, an alternative interpretation of many of these findings is that, in the interest of equalizing transaction costs across earlier and later payments, small delays were introduced between the time of the experiment and the soonest payment. We conduct a laboratory experiment in Kenya in which we elicit time and risk preference parameters from 494 participants, using convex time budgets and tightly controlling for transaction costs. We vary whether same-day payments are made immediately after the experimental session or at the close of the business day. Using the Kenyan mobile money system M-Pesa to make real-time transfers to subjects' phones allows us to make the soonest payments truly immediate. We find strong evidence of present bias, with estimates of the present bias parameter ranging from 0.902 to 0.924 -- but only when same-day payments are made immediately after the experiment. This result suggests that present bias for money does in fact exist, but only for truly immediate payments