• Medientyp: E-Book; Sonderdruck
  • Titel: It matters how to recall – task differences in retrieval practice
  • Beteiligte: Endres, Tino [VerfasserIn]; Kranzdorf, Lena [VerfasserIn]; Schneider, Vivien [VerfasserIn]; Renkl, Alexander [VerfasserIn]
  • Erschienen: Dordrecht: Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2020
  • Erschienen in: Instructional science ; 48, 6 (2020), 699-728
  • Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (30 Seiten); Diagramme
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11251-020-09526-1
  • ISSN: 1573-1952
  • Identifikator:
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: Abstract: The type of a recall task may substantially influence the effects of learning by retrieval practice. In a within-subject design, 54 university students studied two expository texts, followed by retrieval practice with either short-answer tasks (targeted retrieval) or a free-recall task (holistic retrieval). Concerning the direct effects of retrieval practice, short-answer tasks led to increased retention of directly retrieved targeted information from the learning contents, whereas free-recall tasks led to better retention of further information from the learning contents. Concerning indirect effects, short-answer tasks improved metacognitive calibration; free-recall tasks increased self-efficacy and situational interest. These findings confirm the assumption that the effects of retrieval practice depend on the type of recall task: short-answer tasks help us remember targeted information units and foster metacognitive calibration. Free-recall tasks help us remember a broader spectrum of information, and they foster motivational factors
  • Zugangsstatus: Freier Zugang