Lu, Jingfeng
[Verfasser:in]
;
Lu, Yuanzhu
[Sonstige Person, Familie und Körperschaft];
Wang, Zhewei
[Sonstige Person, Familie und Körperschaft];
Zhou, Lixue
[Sonstige Person, Familie und Körperschaft]
Winner-Leave Versus Loser-Leave in Multi-Stage Nested Tullock Contests
Anmerkungen:
Nach Informationen von SSRN wurde die ursprüngliche Fassung des Dokuments June 20, 2020 erstellt
Beschreibung:
In this paper, we compare two procedures for allocating a sequence of fixed prizes in multi-stage nested Tullock contests, in which the number of prizes equals the number of contestants. In a winner-leave (loser-leave) procedure, in each stage, the prizes of the stage are allocated to winners (losers) according to their ranks, and prizes in early stages are higher (lower) than those in later stages. Players who obtain prizes leave the contest and the others proceed to the next stage of competition. For both procedures, it is effort-maximizing to allocate one prize in each stage. Provided that the positive prizes in the sequence are homogeneous, the optimally designed loser-leave procedure generates higher total effort if and only if the number of positive prizes is lower than a threshold. If the positive prizes in the sequence are heterogeneous, then the loser-leave procedure may generate higher total effort, even if the number of positive prizes in the sequence is in the high range