Cappelen, Alexander W.
[VerfasserIn]
;
Hole, Astri Drange
[Sonstige Person, Familie und Körperschaft];
Sorensen, Erik
[Sonstige Person, Familie und Körperschaft];
Tungodden, Bertil
[Sonstige Person, Familie und Körperschaft]
Modeling Individual Choices in Experiments
: Reply to Conte and Moffatt
Erschienen in:NHH Dept. of Economics Discussion Paper ; No. 7/2009
Umfang:
1 Online-Ressource (12 p)
Sprache:
Englisch
DOI:
10.2139/ssrn.1554812
Identifikator:
Entstehung:
Anmerkungen:
Nach Informationen von SSRN wurde die ursprüngliche Fassung des Dokuments August 13, 2009 erstellt
Beschreibung:
In a comment to Cappelen, Hole, S. Sorensen, and Tungodden (2007b), Conte and Moffatt (2009) challenge our use of a random utility model when studying individual choices in a fairness experiment. They propose an alternative approach, what we call the random behavioral model, and they show that the choice of modeling strategy has profound implications for our understanding of the observed behavior. In this note, we discuss how the two approaches differ, and we show that the random behavioral model of Conte and Moffatt (2009) fails to fit the data from our fairness experiment