Anmerkungen:
Nach Informationen von SSRN wurde die ursprüngliche Fassung des Dokuments 2019 erstellt
Beschreibung:
Private investors respond to risk return tradeoffs. The policy environment and regulatory framework significantly influence risk as well as return in the power sector. Power sector reform and policy initiatives for enhanced private participation have been undertaken in a number of developing countries. The economic crisis faced by India in the early 90s led to opening up of the power sector for private investment there. Major policy initiatives were undertaken to encourage private and foreign investment. The investment climate was further strengthened by gradual restructuring of state electricity boards (SEBs) and regulatory reforms. More recently, the Electricity Act 2003 has enabled competition in the sector and improved the policy environment for private investment. Abolition of the single buyer model and phased access to consumers has opened substantial potential for private investment in the sector. The scale of private investment in the Indian power sector is not as encouraging as in the case of some reforming countries in Latin America and Asia. This paper undertakes a comparative analysis of the policy and regulatory environment in the power sector in Argentina, Brazil, People’s Republic of China, India, Mexico and Thailand. We find that the scope, pace and sequencing of the reform process has significant influence on private and foreign investment. Policy clarity and independent regulatory institutions reduce risk perception of investors as well as lenders