• Medientyp: E-Book
  • Titel: How Rice Fights Pandemics : Nature-Crop-Human Interactions Shaped COVID-19 Outcomes
  • Beteiligte: Talhelm, Thomas [Verfasser:in]; Lee, Cheol-Sung [Verfasser:in]; English, Alexander [Verfasser:in]; Wang, Shuang [Verfasser:in]
  • Erschienen: [S.l.]: SSRN, 2022
  • Erschienen in: Talhelm, T., Lee, C.-S., English, A. S., & Shuang, W. (2022). How rice fights pandemics: Nature-crop-human interactions shaped COVID-19 outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • Umfang: 1 Online-Ressource (85 p)
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4169630
  • Identifikator:
  • Schlagwörter: culture ; COVID-19 ; coronavirus ; agriculture ; farming ; rice theory ; individualism ; collectivism
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen: Nach Informationen von SSRN wurde die ursprüngliche Fassung des Dokuments July 22, 2022 erstellt
  • Beschreibung: Wealthy nations led health preparedness rankings in 2019, yet many poor nations controlled COVID-19 better. We argue that a history of rice farming explains why some societies did better. We outline how traditional rice farming led to tight social norms and low-mobility social networks. These social structures helped coordinate societies against COVID-19. Study 1 compares rice- and wheat-farming prefectures within China. Comparing within China allows for controlled comparisons of regions with the same national government, language family, and other potential confounds. Study 2 tests whether the findings generalize to cultures globally. The data shows rice-farming nations have tighter social norms and less-mobile relationships, which predict better COVID outcomes. Rice-farming nations suffered just 3% of the COVID deaths of non-rice nations. These findings suggest that long-run cultural differences influence how rice societies—with over 50% of the world’s population—controlled COVID-19. Culture was critical, yet the preparedness rankings mostly ignored it
  • Zugangsstatus: Freier Zugang