Sie können Bookmarks mittels Listen verwalten, loggen Sie sich dafür bitte in Ihr SLUB Benutzerkonto ein.
Medientyp:
E-Book;
Hochschulschrift
Titel:
A comparison of the money allocation and rating scale to measure support changes towards wildlife species by the general public
:
results of an experimental and longitudinal research design structure in Valdivia, Chile
Nowadays, a challenge in wildlife management and nature conservation is to reach a state of human-wildlife coexistence, integrating wildlife into the human-dominated landscape. Achieving a state of coexistence is urgent as human-wildlife conflicts increase over time. Thus a "route guide" for researchers and conservation practitioners will be needed to identify if a human-wildlife interaction is heading towards conflict or coexistence, enabling them to conduct management activities, when possible, to achieve human-wildlife coexistence. Researchers have used different individual-based attributes as a proxy to measure support towards wildlife species by the general public. Different operationalizations from Environmental Economics and Environmental and Conservation Psychology research fields have been used to measure support. Examples of operationalization are the willingness-to-pay and Likert-type scale, or rating scale, from the first and second research fields. In the first, participants must indicate how much they would be willing to pay to protect a specific wildlife species population in a particular area and time. In the second, participants are asked to rate statements through, e.g., a five-point ordinal rating scale with opposite alternatives between, e.g., strongly agree and strongly disagree. In the human dimension of natural resources management research, variations of these methodologies have been used to measure support, not only for one wildlife species but for a ...