Beschreibung:
Main description: Form und Bedeutung transparenter Partikelverben mit „an0 lassen sich zu ca. 50% aus minimalen Argumentstrukturen von Verb und Partikel erzeugen. Ziel dieser Arbeit ist es, durch eine konstruktionsgrammatische Analyse auch die restlichen 50% in einem Format zu erfassen. Die Kompositionalität zwischen Verb und Konstruktion wird dabei frame-semantisch erklärt. Das System beruht auf flexiblen Schema-Instanz-Beziehungen, in welchem Instanzen Prototypen für Schemata sind. Die Analyse aller Muster einer Partikel zeigt die Reichweite konstruktionsbasierter Erklärungen auf.
Approximately fifty percent of the form and the meaning of transparent German particle verbs with 0an0 can be deduced from the minimal semantic argument structure of the verb and particle. The aim of this study is to create a format for understanding the remaining fifty percent using construction grammar analysis. The study employs frame semantics to explain the compositionality of the verb and the construction. The system is based on a flexible schema-instance relationship, where instances are the prototypes for schemata. Analysis of all patterns for a single particle demonstrates the broad scope of construction-based explanations.
Main description: Approximately fifty percent of the form and the meaning of transparent German particle verbs with 0an0 can be deduced from the minimal semantic argument structure of the verb and particle. The aim of this study is to create a format for understanding the remaining fifty percent using construction grammar analysis. The study employs frame semantics to explain the compositionality of the verb and the construction. The system is based on a flexible schema-instance relationship, where instances are the prototypes for schemata. Analysis of all patterns for a single particle demonstrates the broad scope of construction-based explanations.