Day, Brett
[VerfasserIn];
Bateman, Ian J.
[VerfasserIn];
Carson, Richard T.
[VerfasserIn];
Dupont, Diane
[VerfasserIn];
Louviere, Jordan J.
[VerfasserIn];
Morimoto, Sanae
[VerfasserIn];
Scarpa, Riccardo
[VerfasserIn];
Wang, Paul
[VerfasserIn]
Task independence in stated preference studies: A test of order effect explanations
Sie können Bookmarks mittels Listen verwalten, loggen Sie sich dafür bitte in Ihr SLUB Benutzerkonto ein.
Medientyp:
E-Book;
Bericht
Titel:
Task independence in stated preference studies: A test of order effect explanations
Beteiligte:
Day, Brett
[VerfasserIn];
Bateman, Ian J.
[VerfasserIn];
Carson, Richard T.
[VerfasserIn];
Dupont, Diane
[VerfasserIn];
Louviere, Jordan J.
[VerfasserIn];
Morimoto, Sanae
[VerfasserIn];
Scarpa, Riccardo
[VerfasserIn];
Wang, Paul
[VerfasserIn]
Erschienen:
Norwich: University of East Anglia, The Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE), 2009
Anmerkungen:
Diese Datenquelle enthält auch Bestandsnachweise, die nicht zu einem Volltext führen.
Beschreibung:
We present an experiment designed to investigate the presence and nature of ordering effects within repeated response stated preference studies. We formulate a general structural model of such effects and use this to isolate signature patterns for position-dependent effects (learning about preferences or institutions, and the impact of fatigue) and precedent-dependent effects (starting point effects, reference pricing and various forms of strategic behavior). This is tested within a large sample, full factorial study designed to mitigate against misspecification bias and design-induced error variance problems. Non-parametric and parametric analyses are applied, the latter adopting a novel data-driven approach to the detection of ordering patterns. While we find little evidence of position dependent effects, we do find evidence of a starting point effect and various types of strategic behavior including a reference price effect where respondents tend to reject alternatives that are priced higher than recently seen alternatives.