• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: From critical technical practice to reflexive data science
  • Beteiligte: Hirsbrunner, Simon David [VerfasserIn]; Tebbe, Michael [VerfasserIn]; Müller-Birn, Claudia [VerfasserIn]
  • Erschienen: Freie Universität Berlin: Refubium (FU Berlin), 2024
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.17169/refubium-40962; https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565221132243
  • Schlagwörter: critical data studies ; data science ; human-centered design ; AI ethics ; human-centered computing ; artificial intelligence ; digital media research ; critical algorithm studies
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen: Diese Datenquelle enthält auch Bestandsnachweise, die nicht zu einem Volltext führen.
  • Beschreibung: In this article, we reconsider elements of Agre’s critical technical practice approach (Agre, 1997) for critical technical practice approach for reflexive artificial intelligence (AI) research and explore ways and expansions to make it productive for an operationalization in contemporary data science. Drawing on Jörg Niewöhner’s co-laboration approach, we show how frictions within interdisciplinary work can be made productive for reflection. We then show how software development environments can be repurposed to infrastructure reflexivities and to make co-laborative engagement with AI-related technology possible and productive. We document our own co-laborative engagement with machine learning and highlight three exemplary critical technical practices that emerged out of the co-laboration: negotiating comparabilities, shifting contextual attention and challenging similarity and difference. We finally wrap up the conceptual and empirical elements and propose Reflexive Data Science (RDS) as a methodology for co-laborative engagement and infrastructured reflexivities in contemporary AI-related research. We come back to Agre’s ways of operationalizing reflexivity and introduce the building blocks of RDS: (1) organizing encounters of social contestation, (2) infrastructuring a network of anchoring devices enabling reflection, (3) negotiating timely matters of concern and (4) designing for reflection. With our research, we aim at contributing to the methodological underpinnings of epistemological and social reflection in contemporary AI research.
  • Zugangsstatus: Freier Zugang
  • Rechte-/Nutzungshinweise: Namensnennung (CC BY)