• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: A Single-Step Multiclass SVM Based on Quantum Annealing for Remote Sensing Data Classification
  • Beteiligte: Delilbasic, Amer [Verfasser:in]; Le Saux, Bertrand [Verfasser:in]; Riedel, Morris [Verfasser:in]; Michielsen, Kristel [Verfasser:in]; Cavallaro, Gabriele [Verfasser:in]
  • Erschienen: IEEE, 2024
  • Erschienen in: IEEE journal of selected topics in applied earth observations and remote sensing 17, 1434 - 1445 (2024). doi:10.1109/JSTARS.2023.3336926
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2023.3336926; https://doi.org/10.34734/FZJ-2023-05019
  • ISSN: 2151-1535; 1939-1404
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen: Diese Datenquelle enthält auch Bestandsnachweise, die nicht zu einem Volltext führen.
  • Beschreibung: In recent years, the development of quantum annealers has enabled experimental demonstrations and has increased research interest in applications of quantum annealing, such as in quantum machine learning and in particular for the popular quantum Support Vector Machine (SVM). Several versions of the quantum SVM have been proposed, and quantum annealing has been shown to be effective in them. Extensions to multiclass problems have also been made, which consist of an ensemble of multiple binary classifiers. This work proposes a novel quantum SVM formulation for direct multiclass classification based on quantum annealing, called Quantum Multiclass SVM (QMSVM). The multiclass classification problem is formulated as a single quadratic unconstrained binary optimization problem solved with quantum annealing. The main objective of this work is to evaluate the feasibility, accuracy, and time performance of this approach. Experiments have been performed on the D-Wave Advantage quantum annealer for a classification problem on remote sensing data. Results indicate that, despite the memory demands of the quantum annealer, QMSVM can achieve an accuracy that is comparable to standard SVM methods, such as the one-versus-one (OVO), depending on the dataset (compared to OVO: 0.8663 vs 0.8598 on Toulouse, 0.8123 vs 0.8521 on Potsdam). More importantly, it scales much more efficiently with the number of training examples, resulting in nearly constant time (compared to OVO: 85.72s vs 248.02s on Toulouse, 58.89s vs 580.17s on Potsdam). This work shows an approach for bringing together classical and quantum computation, solving practical problems in remote sensing with current hardware.
  • Zugangsstatus: Freier Zugang