Aniello, Gianmarco
[VerfasserIn];
Ball, Christopher
[VerfasserIn];
Bertsch, Valentin
[VerfasserIn];
Kuckshinrichs, Wilhelm
[VerfasserIn];
Shamon, Hawal
[VerfasserIn]
Comparing energy technologies across alternative regulatory scenarios: Profitability, promotion schemes and the potential for a cost-efficient decarbonization of the German residential sector
Sie können Bookmarks mittels Listen verwalten, loggen Sie sich dafür bitte in Ihr SLUB Benutzerkonto ein.
Medientyp:
Elektronischer Konferenzbericht
Titel:
Comparing energy technologies across alternative regulatory scenarios: Profitability, promotion schemes and the potential for a cost-efficient decarbonization of the German residential sector
Beteiligte:
Aniello, Gianmarco
[VerfasserIn];
Ball, Christopher
[VerfasserIn];
Bertsch, Valentin
[VerfasserIn];
Kuckshinrichs, Wilhelm
[VerfasserIn];
Shamon, Hawal
[VerfasserIn]
Erschienen in:29, 7 pp. (2022). special issue: "Energy Proceedings (ISSN 2004-2965)" ; 14th International Conference on Applied Energy, ICAE2022, Bochum, Germany, 2022-08-08 - 2022-08-11
Sprache:
Englisch
Entstehung:
Anmerkungen:
Diese Datenquelle enthält auch Bestandsnachweise, die nicht zu einem Volltext führen.
Beschreibung:
We assess alternative energy technologies for German single-family houses (i.e., hybrid gas heating with solar thermal energy, electric heat pumps, PV and BES systems) in terms of profitability and CO2 emissions. Under the status-quo regulatory framework, the energy transition in the heating sector is fostered through grants for replacing old heating systems, whereas PV generation is fostered by feed-in tariffs and indirect subsidies for self-consumption. We consider alternative regulatory scenarios with a more market-oriented approach, finding that a CO2-oriented reform of energy surcharges and taxes, as well as a reform of network charges, can support a more cost-efficient energy transition in the residential sector.