Krumm, Dominik
[VerfasserIn];
Cockcroft, John
[VerfasserIn];
Zaumseil, Falk
[VerfasserIn];
Odenwald, Stephan
[VerfasserIn];
Milani, Thomas L.
[VerfasserIn];
Louw, Quinette
[VerfasserIn]
Analytical evaluation of the effects of inconsistent anthropometric measurements on joint kinematics in motion capturing
Sie können Bookmarks mittels Listen verwalten, loggen Sie sich dafür bitte in Ihr SLUB Benutzerkonto ein.
Medientyp:
E-Artikel
Titel:
Analytical evaluation of the effects of inconsistent anthropometric measurements on joint kinematics in motion capturing
Weitere Titel:
Übersetzter Titel: Analytische Bewertung der Auswirkungen fehlerhafter anthropometrischer Messungen auf die Gelenkkinematik bei der Bewegungserfassung
Beteiligte:
Krumm, Dominik
[VerfasserIn];
Cockcroft, John
[VerfasserIn];
Zaumseil, Falk
[VerfasserIn];
Odenwald, Stephan
[VerfasserIn];
Milani, Thomas L.
[VerfasserIn];
Louw, Quinette
[VerfasserIn]
Erschienen:
Amsterdam: Elsevier, [2022]
Erschienen in:Gait & Posture ; 46 (2016), Seite 1-4
Beschreibung:
Clinical decisions based on gait data obtained by optoelectronic motion capturing require profound knowledge about the repeatability of the used measurement systems and methods. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of inconsistent anthropometric measurements on joint kinematics calculated with the Plug-in Gait model. Therefore, a sensitivity study was conducted to ascertain how joint kinematics output is affected to different anthropometric data input. One previously examined gait session of a healthy male subject and his anthropometric data that were assessed by two experienced examiners served as a basis for this analytical evaluation. This sensitivity study yielded a maximum difference in joint kinematics by the two sets of anthropometrics of up to 1.2°. In conclusion, this study has shown that the reliability of subjects’ anthropometrics assessed by experienced examiners has no considerable effects on joint kinematics.