Beschreibung:
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Anastomosis of the colon to the anal canal is now an accepted technique in the surgical management of low and mid rectal cancers. Although significant postoperative bowel disturbance is often seen with straight colo‐anal anastomosis, controversy exists over the benefit of adding a colonic pouch for low anastomoses.</jats:p><jats:p>Several short and long‐term studies have demonstrated the early functional superiority of pouch‐anal over straight anastomosis. Pouch construction does not compromise anal physiological parameters. It is recommended the pouch be constructed from a length of descending colon and be small (5 cm) in size to adequately act as a neo‐rectum; long‐term evacuatory difficulties are encountered with the construction of large pouches (10 cm). Anastomotic complications appear to be less frequent with pouch surgery; construction of a pouch does not significantly add to operative time, patient morbidity and mortality. At present there is no compromise to long‐term oncological survival. The data supporting these statements is weak and based largely upon retrospective studies. Furthermore the impact of improved function with pouch‐anal anastomosis on overall quality of life has been poorly investigated. Further prospective randomized studies are required to ascertain whether the potential benefits of a colonic pouch are realized in the randomized setting.</jats:p>