Beschreibung:
<jats:title>Summary</jats:title><jats:p>
<jats:list list-type="explicit-label">
<jats:list-item><jats:p>Follow‐up of patients discharged from the intensive care unit (ICU) is recommended as a means of service evaluation (Department of Health (2000). <jats:italic>Comprehensive Critical Care: a Review of Adult Critical Care Services</jats:italic>), in order to monitor the quality of the services provided</jats:p></jats:list-item>
<jats:list-item><jats:p>Without patient follow‐up, ICU staff have only ‘death’ or ‘discharge alive from hospital’ as clinical outcomes from which to judge practice performance, and limited evidence exists on which to base decisions about improvements to critical care practice (Audit Commission (1999). <jats:italic>Critical to Success – the Place of Efficient and Effective Critical Care Services Within the Acute Hospital </jats:italic>)</jats:p></jats:list-item>
<jats:list-item><jats:p>To address these issues the Regional Intensive Care Unit (RICU) obtained information from patient assessment/interview on problems experienced by patients within 8–9 days (mean), following discharge from RICU</jats:p></jats:list-item>
<jats:list-item><jats:p>A nurse‐administered questionnaire was used to identify functional outcomes, nutrition and psychological issues such as anxiety and sleep disturbances</jats:p></jats:list-item>
<jats:list-item><jats:p>Benefits of patient follow‐up introduced and planned include:</jats:p></jats:list-item>
</jats:list>
</jats:p><jats:p>
<jats:list list-type="explicit-label">
<jats:list-item><jats:p>patient diaries for long‐term patients</jats:p></jats:list-item>
<jats:list-item><jats:p>input from clinical psychologist</jats:p></jats:list-item>
<jats:list-item><jats:p>review of sedation used in RICU</jats:p></jats:list-item>
</jats:list>
</jats:p>