• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: Ruling out clinically suspected pulmonary embolism by assessment of clinical probability and D-dimer levels: a management study
  • Beteiligte: Lutisan, Johan; Marwijk Kooy, Marinus; Kuipers, Bart; Oostdijk, Ad; van der Leur, Jef; Büller, Harry; Leclercq, Monique
  • Erschienen: Georg Thieme Verlag KG, 2003
  • Erschienen in: Thrombosis and Haemostasis
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1613548
  • ISSN: 0340-6245; 2567-689X
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <jats:title>Summary</jats:title><jats:p>D-dimer test combined with clinical probability assessment has been proposed as the first step in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). In a prospective management study we investigated the safety and efficiency of excluding PE by a normal D-dimer combined with a low or moderate clinical probability. Of the 202 study patients this combination ruled out PE in 64 (32%) patients. The 3-month thromboembolic risk in these patients was 0% (95% CI, 0.0-5.6%).The prevalence of PE in the entire cohort was 29% (59 patients), whereas in the low, moderate and high clinical probability groups this was 25%, 26% and 50%, respectively. We conclude that ruling out suspected PE by a normal D-dimer combined with a low or moderate clinical probability appears to be a safe and efficient strategy. The accuracy of the clinical probability assessment is modest.</jats:p>