Accuracy and reliability of forensic handwriting comparisons

Medientyp: E-Artikel

Titel: Accuracy and reliability of forensic handwriting comparisons

Beteiligte: Hicklin, R. Austin; Eisenhart, Linda; Richetelli, Nicole; Miller, Meredith D.; Belcastro, Peter; Burkes, Ted M.; Parks, Connie L.; Smith, Michael A.; Buscaglia, JoAnn; Peters, Eugene M.; Perlman, Rebecca Schwartz; Abonamah, Jocelyn V.; Eckenrode, Brian A.

Erschienen: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2022

Sprache: Englisch

DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2119944119

ISSN: 0027-8424; 1091-6490

Schlagwörter: Multidisciplinary

Entstehung:

Anmerkungen:

Beschreibung: Forensic handwriting examination involves the comparison of writing samples by forensic document examiners (FDEs) to determine whether or not they were written by the same person. Here we report the results of a large-scale study conducted to assess the accuracy and reliability of handwriting comparison conclusions. Eighty-six practicing FDEs each conducted up to 100 handwriting comparisons, resulting in 7,196 conclusions on 180 distinct comparison sets, using a five-level conclusion scale. Erroneous “written by” conclusions (false positives) were reached in 3.1% of the nonmated comparisons, while 1.1% of the mated comparisons yielded erroneous “not written by” conclusions (false negatives). False positive rates were markedly higher for nonmated samples written by twins (8.7%) compared to nontwins (2.5%). Notable associations between training and performance were observed: FDEs with less than 2 y of formal training generally had higher error rates, but they also had higher true positive and true negative rates because they tended to provide more definitive conclusions; FDEs with at least 2 y of formal training were less likely to make definitive conclusions, but those definitive conclusions they made were more likely to be correct (higher positive predictive and negative predictive values). We did not observe any association between writing style (cursive vs. printing) and rates of errors or incorrect conclusions. This report also provides details on the repeatability and reproducibility of conclusions, and reports how conclusions are affected by the quantity of writing and the similarity of content.

Zugangsstatus: Freier Zugang

Nur in Feld suchen:

Zuletzt gesuchte Begriffe: