• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: Study on the different type of hydrological input towards the accuracy of catchment discharge hydrograph
  • Beteiligte: Safrudin, N A; Wahab, M A; Makhtar, S M Z; Seman, N A; Kamarudzaman, A N; Jaafar, A S; Azlinda, A G
  • Erschienen: IOP Publishing, 2021
  • Erschienen in: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
  • Sprache: Nicht zu entscheiden
  • DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/920/1/012042
  • ISSN: 1755-1315; 1755-1307
  • Schlagwörter: General Medicine
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>For hydrological applications, several rainfall measurement techniques are available, each with its own spatial and temporal resolution and errors. When these rainfall datasets are used as input for hydrological models, errors and uncertainties are propagated throughout the hydrological system. This research paper is using rainfall data from two different measurement tools namely rain gauge and radar. Using these two types of measurement tools, it is expected dissimilar output due to the different working principle. Arau catchment in Perlis were selected as the study area. The rainfall data used is in the unit of intensity with time interval 10 minutes for both instruments. Storm Water Management Model 5 (SWMM5) were used as model to simulate the discharge of catchment area. Sensitivity analysis is carried out in this study to determine the major parameters that influence to shape of hydrograph and peak flow. Then, calibration process using five (5) storm events have been performed using available information such as conduits lengths, shape of conduits, impervious and pervious surface using trial and error process. Good correlation between observed and simulated hydrograph on 18 September 2006 has been found to be the best Correlation coefficient (r) and Root mean square error (RMSE) equal to 0.92 and 0.14 respectively. The same parameter used for that storm event was chosen to be applied in validation event. Validation results also in the acceptable range with r is found more than 50% correlation. Next, using the rainfall data captured by radar that converted using equation Z=40R<jats:sup>1.6</jats:sup> developed by researcher [1] for the similar date of storm event and similar catchment conditions, all the hydrograph shape shows significant drop. As a conclusion, different type of measurement tools for rainfall gives significant different to the catchment discharge and can be seen that rain gauge are better to use to simulate rainfall compared to the radar.</jats:p>
  • Zugangsstatus: Freier Zugang